flowchart LR
O[Organisational<br/>analysis<br/>WHERE] --> T[Task<br/>analysis<br/>WHAT]
T --> P[Person<br/>analysis<br/>WHO]
P --> D[Training<br/>design]
D --> X[Delivery]
X --> E[Evaluation]
E -. feedback .-> O
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
8 Training and Development: Concept, Needs Analysis, On-the-Job and Off-the-Job Methods, Learning Theories, and the Kirkpatrick-Phillips Evaluation Models
8.1 Why Training?
Selection ensures the right person joins. Training and Development (T&D) ensures the right person continues to be right as technology, job content and career stage change. Training is job-focused, short-term and aimed at the current role; development is person-focused, long-term and aimed at future roles and broader growth.
8.2 1 · Training vs Development vs Education
| Dimension | Training | Development | Education |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | Job — current | Person — future | Mind — general |
| Horizon | Short | Long | Long |
| Audience | Non-managers mainly | Managers mainly | All |
| Content | Specific skill | Conceptual + behavioural | Broad |
| Initiator | Organisation | Individual + organisation | Self / institution |
NTA repeatedly tests the distinction: Training = current job; Development = future career.
8.3 2 · Objectives of Training
- Bridge the gap between current and required performance.
- Reduce supervision, errors and waste.
- Improve safety.
- Prepare for promotion and succession.
- Improve morale and reduce turnover.
- Help the firm adapt to technology and strategy changes.
8.4 3 · Training Needs Analysis — Three Levels
The classical McGehee and Thayer (1961) three-level framework remains the textbook standard.
| Level | Question answered | Data sources |
|---|---|---|
| Organisational analysis | Where in the organisation is training needed? | Strategy, structure, climate, resources |
| Task / Operational analysis | What must be taught? | Job analysis, performance standards |
| Person / Man analysis | Who needs the training and what kind? | Performance appraisal, tests, observation |
8.5 4 · Methods of Training
8.5.1 On-the-Job (OJT) Methods
| Method | What it is |
|---|---|
| Coaching | Day-to-day guidance by supervisor or coach |
| Mentoring | Long-term career guidance by a senior |
| Job rotation | Planned movement through different jobs |
| Apprenticeship | Combination of OJT and classroom for skilled trades (Apprentices Act 1961) |
| Internship | Pre-employment OJT for students |
| Understudy / assistantship | Working alongside the incumbent to learn the role |
| Committee assignment | Member of a task force exposed to multiple problems |
| Job instruction training (JIT) | Step-by-step “show, tell, do, follow-up” |
8.5.2 Off-the-Job Methods
| Method | What it is |
|---|---|
| Lecture / classroom | One-way transfer; cost-efficient |
| Conference / seminar | Two-way knowledge sharing |
| Case study (Harvard) | Analysis of a real situation |
| Role play | Acting out interpersonal situations |
| In-basket exercise | Sorting and prioritising simulated mail |
| Business games / simulations | Compete in a simulated market |
| Programmed instruction | Self-paced with immediate feedback (Skinner) |
| Behaviour modelling | Observe-imitate-practise-feedback (Bandura) |
| Sensitivity / T-group training | Self-awareness in an unstructured group (Kurt Lewin / NTL) |
| Vestibule training | Off-line replica of actual work area |
| e-learning / MOOCs | Digital, asynchronous, scalable |
8.5.3 A Quick Comparison
| Dimension | On-the-Job | Off-the-Job |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Low | Higher |
| Transfer of learning | Direct | Risk of gap |
| Production disruption | Possible | None |
| Standardisation | Low | High |
| Trainer expertise | Variable | High |
8.6 5 · Learning Theories that Inform Training Design
| Theory | Author | Key idea | Training implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classical conditioning | Pavlov | Stimulus-response association | Cue-based safety training |
| Operant conditioning | Skinner | Behaviour shaped by consequences (reinforcement, punishment) | Programmed instruction, behavioural rewards |
| Social learning | Bandura | People learn by observing models | Behaviour modelling |
| Cognitive | Gagne | Information-processing, nine events of instruction | Sequenced instructional design |
| Experiential learning | Kolb | Four-stage cycle: experience → reflection → conceptualise → experiment | Case studies, simulation, action learning |
8.6.1 Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle
flowchart LR
CE[Concrete<br/>experience] --> RO[Reflective<br/>observation]
RO --> AC[Abstract<br/>conceptualisation]
AC --> AE[Active<br/>experimentation]
AE --> CE
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
Kolb also describes four learning styles — Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, Accommodator — produced by combinations of the cycle’s stages.
8.7 6 · Principles of Learning that Improve Training
- Motivation — the learner must want to learn.
- Reinforcement — feedback and reward consolidate behaviour.
- Whole vs part learning — match to task complexity.
- Distributed vs massed practice — spaced practice outperforms cramming.
- Active practice — doing beats hearing.
- Meaningfulness — connect new material to known.
- Goal setting — clear, challenging goals (Locke).
- Individual differences — pace, mode, and starting point vary.
8.8 7 · Management Development Methods
| Method | What it does |
|---|---|
| Coaching & mentoring | Personalised one-on-one guidance |
| Job rotation & special assignments | Cross-functional exposure |
| Action learning | Real organisational problem solved by a team |
| Case method | Harvard-style analysis |
| Business games & simulations | Decision making in a simulated firm |
| Sensitivity (T-group) training | Inter-personal awareness |
| Conferences & lectures | Conceptual updates |
| University programmes / executive MBA | Conceptual + analytical foundation |
| Outdoor / adventure training | Team building, risk taking |
| 360° feedback for development | Self-awareness from multi-source feedback |
8.9 8 · Evaluation of Training
8.9.1 Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1959)
| Level | Measures | Typical instrument |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Reaction | Did they like it? | Smile sheet, satisfaction survey |
| 2. Learning | Did they learn it? | Pre/post test, skill demonstration |
| 3. Behaviour | Are they using it on the job? | Supervisor observation, 360° |
| 4. Results | Did it move the business? | KPIs — productivity, quality, sales, safety |
8.9.2 Phillips’ Fifth Level — Return on Investment (1996)
Jack Phillips extended Kirkpatrick by adding a fifth level:
ROI (%) = [(Programme benefits − Programme costs) ÷ Programme costs] × 100
Kirkpatrick = 4 levels. Phillips = 5 levels (adds ROI). NTA stems often ask “who added ROI?” — answer is Phillips.
8.9.3 Newer Frameworks
- CIRO (Warr, Bird & Rackham): Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome.
- CIPP (Stufflebeam): Context, Input, Process, Product.
8.10 9 · Transfer of Training
Training only matters if it transfers to the job.
| Type | What happens |
|---|---|
| Positive transfer | Learning improves on-job performance |
| Negative transfer | Learning interferes with performance |
| Zero transfer | No effect either way |
Transfer is enhanced by trainee characteristics (ability, motivation), training design (similar conditions, varied practice) and work environment (supervisor support, opportunity to use).
8.11 Practice Questions
Which best distinguishes training from development?
View solution
The McGehee and Thayer framework analyses training needs at how many levels?
View solution
Which is not an on-the-job method?
View solution
Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation are:
View solution
Jack Phillips extended Kirkpatrick's model by adding which fifth level?
View solution
Arrange Kolb's experiential learning cycle in correct order:
(i) Reflective observation
(ii) Active experimentation
(iii) Concrete experience
(iv) Abstract conceptualisation
View solution
Match the theorist with the school:
| (i) | Pavlov | (a) | Social learning |
| (ii) | Skinner | (b) | Operant conditioning |
| (iii) | Bandura | (c) | Experiential learning cycle |
| (iv) | Kolb | (d) | Classical conditioning |
View solution
Sensitivity (T-group) training is most associated with:
View solution
Vestibule training is best described as:
View solution
Negative transfer of training means:
View solution
The in-basket exercise primarily develops:
View solution
Programmed instruction is rooted in the work of:
View solution
CIRO stands for:
View solution
Behaviour modelling as a training method draws most directly on:
View solution
Apprenticeship training in India is governed by:
View solution
A supervisor's observation that the trainee is using the new technique on the shop floor relates to which level of Kirkpatrick's model?
View solution
Research on learning principles shows:
View solution
Which is not one of Kolb's four learning styles?
View solution
Action learning, popularised by Reg Revans, is best described as:
View solution
Phillips' ROI for training is calculated as:
View solution
8.12 Quick Recall
- Training = job + short-term + skill; Development = career + long-term + person.
- McGehee-Thayer TNA — three levels: organisational (where), task (what), person (who).
- OJT methods: coaching, mentoring, job rotation, apprenticeship (Apprentices Act 1961), internship, understudy, JIT.
- Off-JT methods: lecture, case, role play, in-basket, business games, programmed instruction (Skinner), behaviour modelling (Bandura), sensitivity training (Lewin), vestibule, e-learning.
- Learning theorists: Pavlov (classical), Skinner (operant), Bandura (social), Gagne (cognitive), Kolb (experiential).
- Kolb’s cycle: Concrete experience → Reflective observation → Abstract conceptualisation → Active experimentation. Four styles: Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, Accommodator.
- Kirkpatrick — four levels: Reaction, Learning, Behaviour, Results (1959).
- Phillips — fifth level: Return on Investment (ROI) (1996). ROI = [(Benefits − Costs) ÷ Costs] × 100.
- CIRO (Warr, Bird & Rackham): Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome.
- Transfer of training: positive, negative, zero — depends on trainee, design, work environment.
- Spacing effect: distributed practice beats massed.