flowchart TB
M[Motivation<br/>theories]
M --> C[Content<br/>WHAT]
M --> P[Process<br/>HOW]
C --> Ma[Maslow]
C --> Al[Alderfer ERG]
C --> He[Herzberg]
C --> Mc[McClelland]
P --> V[Vroom expectancy]
P --> Ad[Adams equity]
P --> L[Locke goal-setting]
P --> PL[Porter-Lawler]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
20 Attitude and Motivation: ABC Components, Cognitive Dissonance, Job Satisfaction and the Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McClelland, Vroom, Adams, Locke and Porter-Lawler
20.1 What Moves People at Work
A worker’s behaviour at the office is rarely produced by skill alone. Two related forces are decisive — what they feel about the work (attitudes) and how much they want to put effort into it (motivation). Attitudes give the direction (toward or away from); motivation gives the energy. This chapter covers the structure of attitudes, the classical theories of job satisfaction and the major motivation frameworks that fill any HRM or OB syllabus.
20.2 A · Attitudes
20.2.1 Definition
An attitude is a learned predisposition to respond consistently — favourably or unfavourably — toward a person, object, idea or situation. Attitudes are evaluations carrying cognitive, affective and behavioural elements.
20.2.2 The ABC Model
| Component | What it is | Example (toward overtime) |
|---|---|---|
| A — Affective | Feeling | “I dislike staying late” |
| B — Behavioural | Intention to act | “I will refuse extra shifts” |
| C — Cognitive | Belief | “Overtime harms health and family life” |
The classic acronym A-B-C captures the three sides of every attitude. NTA stems often ask which side a given statement reflects.
20.2.3 Sources of Attitudes
- Family and early socialisation.
- Peer group and reference groups.
- Experience — direct contact with the object of the attitude.
- Media and culture.
- Personality and biology.
20.2.5 Meyer and Allen’s Three Components of Commitment
| Component | What it captures |
|---|---|
| Affective | “I want to stay” — emotional attachment |
| Continuance | “I need to stay” — costs of leaving |
| Normative | “I ought to stay” — moral obligation |
20.2.6 Cognitive Dissonance
Leon Festinger (1957) described the discomfort a person feels when behaviour and belief, or two beliefs, conflict. The person tries to reduce the dissonance by:
- Changing the behaviour.
- Changing the belief.
- Adding new cognitions (“everyone does it”).
- Minimising the importance of the inconsistency.
Cognitive dissonance = Festinger’s 1957 idea. Discomfort from inconsistency between behaviour and belief drives change in one of them.
20.2.7 Changing Attitudes — Kelman’s Three Processes
Herbert Kelman distinguished three routes through which attitudes change:
| Process | Driver | Depth |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Reward or punishment | Shallow; lasts while incentive lasts |
| Identification | Liking and similarity with the source | Moderate |
| Internalisation | Value-congruent persuasion | Deep; survives the source |
20.3 B · Job Satisfaction
20.3.1 Definition
Edwin Locke defined job satisfaction as “a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences.”
20.3.2 Determinants
- Mentally challenging work.
- Equitable rewards.
- Supportive working conditions.
- Supportive colleagues.
- Personality–job fit (Holland).
- Good supervision.
- Voice and participation in decisions.
20.3.3 Consequences — The EVLN Model
When satisfaction declines, employees respond in one of four ways (Rusbult & Lowery, building on Hirschman):
| Response | Active or Passive | Constructive or Destructive |
|---|---|---|
| Exit | Active | Destructive |
| Voice | Active | Constructive |
| Loyalty | Passive | Constructive |
| Neglect | Passive | Destructive |
20.3.4 Measuring Job Satisfaction
- Job Descriptive Index (JDI) — five facets.
- Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) — 20 facets.
- Single global rating — one or two questions.
20.4 C · Motivation
20.4.1 Definition
Motivation is the set of forces that initiate, direct and sustain behaviour toward a goal. Robbins frames it as the willingness to exert effort toward an organisational goal, conditioned by the effort’s ability to satisfy individual needs.
20.4.2 Two Families of Theory
| Family | Question | Theories |
|---|---|---|
| Content | What motivates? | Maslow, Alderfer’s ERG, Herzberg, McClelland |
| Process | How does motivation work? | Vroom (expectancy), Adams (equity), Locke (goal-setting), Porter-Lawler |
20.4.3 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (1943)
| Level | Need |
|---|---|
| 5 — Self-actualisation | Achieving one’s full potential |
| 4 — Esteem | Self-respect, status, recognition |
| 3 — Social (belongingness) | Friendship, love, affiliation |
| 2 — Safety | Security, stability, protection |
| 1 — Physiological | Food, water, shelter, sleep |
Maslow’s two key claims: lower needs dominate until reasonably met, and a satisfied need is no longer a strong motivator.
20.4.4 Alderfer’s ERG Theory (1969)
Three need categories, with two flexibility features Maslow’s hierarchy lacked.
| Category | Maps roughly to Maslow |
|---|---|
| E — Existence | Physiological + safety |
| R — Relatedness | Social + external esteem |
| G — Growth | Self-actualisation + internal esteem |
Alderfer added the frustration-regression principle — if a higher need is blocked, a lower need re-asserts itself.
20.4.5 Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (1959)
Frederick Herzberg’s Motivation to Work study of accountants and engineers in Pittsburgh produced the two-factor (hygiene-motivator) theory.
| Type | Examples | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Hygiene factors (extrinsic) | Pay, supervision, company policy, working conditions, interpersonal relations | Their absence creates dissatisfaction; their presence merely removes dissatisfaction |
| Motivators (intrinsic) | Achievement, recognition, responsibility, work itself, advancement, growth | Their presence creates satisfaction and drives motivation |
Herzberg’s signature insight: the opposite of satisfaction is no satisfaction; the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction. Hygiene and motivator factors operate on two separate continua.
Herzberg’s logic became the academic basis of job enrichment.
20.4.6 McClelland’s Theory of Learned Needs (1961)
David McClelland argued three needs are learned through life experience and culture.
| Need | Description | High scorers prefer |
|---|---|---|
| n-Ach (Achievement) | Drive to do well against a standard | Moderately challenging goals, fast feedback, personal responsibility |
| n-Aff (Affiliation) | Drive for warm, friendly relationships | Cooperative, harmonious settings |
| n-Pow (Power) | Drive to influence and control others | Influence-rich, status-laden roles |
McClelland measured needs through the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) — a projective tool.
20.4.7 Vroom’s Expectancy Theory (1964)
Victor Vroom’s model is the textbook process theory of motivation.
| Component | Question it answers |
|---|---|
| Expectancy (E) | “Will my effort lead to performance?” |
| Instrumentality (I) | “Will performance lead to rewards?” |
| Valence (V) | “Are the rewards desirable to me?” |
Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence
Because the three are multiplied, if any one is zero, motivation is zero. The HR implication: ensure capable people, link performance to reward, and offer rewards employees actually want.
20.4.8 Adams’s Equity Theory (1963)
J. Stacy Adams argued people compare their outcome-to-input ratio with that of a referent. Perceived inequity triggers tension and behavioural change.
| Comparison | Perception |
|---|---|
| O/I (self) = O/I (referent) | Equity — content |
| O/I (self) < O/I (referent) | Under-reward — anger, reduced effort, complaint |
| O/I (self) > O/I (referent) | Over-reward — guilt, increased effort or rationalisation |
Adams identified four referent categories — self-inside, self-outside, other-inside, other-outside.
20.4.9 Locke’s Goal-Setting Theory (1968)
Edwin Locke and Gary Latham showed that specific, difficult goals, accepted by the person and accompanied by feedback, produce higher performance than vague “do your best” goals.
| Condition | Effect |
|---|---|
| Specific goal | Beats general goal |
| Difficult but attainable goal | Beats easy goal |
| Acceptance / commitment | Required for difficulty to motivate |
| Feedback | Allows mid-course correction |
| Self-efficacy | Strengthens persistence |
| Task complexity moderates | Simple tasks gain more than complex ones |
Goal-setting is the conceptual basis of MBO and SMART goals.
20.4.10 Porter-Lawler Model (1968)
Lyman Porter and Edward Lawler integrated Vroom’s expectancy ideas with rewards and satisfaction in a fuller model.
| Step | Element |
|---|---|
| 1 | Effort depends on perceived value of reward × perceived probability of effort leading to reward |
| 2 | Performance depends on effort × ability and role perception |
| 3 | Rewards (intrinsic + extrinsic) follow performance |
| 4 | Perceived equity of rewards determines… |
| 5 | Satisfaction — which in turn updates the perceived value of rewards |
The model reversed the older “satisfaction → performance” intuition by suggesting performance leads to satisfaction through rewards.
20.4.11 Modern Process Theories Worth Knowing
| Theory | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Self-determination theory | Deci & Ryan | Three innate needs — autonomy, competence, relatedness — drive intrinsic motivation |
| Cognitive evaluation theory | Deci | Extrinsic rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation for interesting tasks |
| Self-efficacy theory | Bandura | Belief in one’s capability to perform |
| Job characteristics model | Hackman & Oldham | Motivation flows from five job dimensions (covered in T&D chapter) |
| Reinforcement theory | Skinner | Consequences drive behaviour (covered in Learning chapter) |
20.5 Practice Questions
"I dislike working late nights" is most clearly which component of an attitude?
View solution
Cognitive dissonance theory was proposed by:
View solution
Meyer and Allen's three components of organisational commitment are:
View solution
At the top of Maslow's hierarchy is:
View solution
In Herzberg's two-factor theory, salary is best classified as a:
View solution
McClelland measured the achievement need primarily using:
View solution
In Vroom's expectancy theory, motivation is the product of:
View solution
Adams's equity theory says employees compare:
View solution
Goal-setting theory says highest performance follows from goals that are:
View solution
Match the theory with its author:
| (i) | Two-factor theory | (a) | Vroom |
| (ii) | Equity theory | (b) | Herzberg |
| (iii) | Expectancy theory | (c) | McClelland |
| (iv) | Learned-needs theory | (d) | Adams |
View solution
A distinctive feature of Alderfer's ERG theory, absent in Maslow, is:
View solution
A key insight of the Porter-Lawler model is that:
View solution
Attitude change driven by adopting the source's values as one's own is termed:
View solution
In the EVLN model of responses to dissatisfaction, "Voice" is best described as:
View solution
According to Herzberg, the opposite of "satisfaction" is:
View solution
Identifying psychologically with one's job is best termed:
View solution
Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan) describes three innate psychological needs. They are:
View solution
Cognitive evaluation theory warns that:
View solution
Maslow's hierarchy is classified as a:
View solution
Job satisfaction was defined as "a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job" by:
View solution
20.6 Quick Recall
- Attitude = learned predisposition; three components — ABC (Affective, Behavioural, Cognitive).
- Three job attitudes: job satisfaction, job involvement, organisational commitment.
- Meyer-Allen commitment — three components: affective (want), continuance (need), normative (ought).
- Cognitive dissonance — Festinger (1957) — discomfort from belief-behaviour conflict drives change.
- Kelman’s three attitude-change processes: compliance, identification, internalisation (deepest).
- Job satisfaction (Locke) = pleasurable emotional state from job appraisal. Measure: JDI, MSQ.
- EVLN responses to dissatisfaction: Exit (active-destructive), Voice (active-constructive), Loyalty (passive-constructive), Neglect (passive-destructive).
- Motivation theories — two families: content (what — Maslow, ERG, Herzberg, McClelland) and process (how — Vroom, Adams, Locke, Porter-Lawler).
- Maslow’s five needs: physiological → safety → social → esteem → self-actualisation.
- Alderfer ERG: Existence-Relatedness-Growth; frustration-regression.
- Herzberg two-factor: Hygiene (extrinsic — pay, supervision, conditions) prevents dissatisfaction; Motivators (intrinsic — achievement, recognition, work itself, responsibility, growth) produce satisfaction. Opposite of satisfaction = no satisfaction.
- McClelland’s three learned needs: n-Ach, n-Aff, n-Pow. Measured by TAT.
- Vroom expectancy: Motivation = Expectancy × Instrumentality × Valence — multiplicative.
- Adams equity: outcome-to-input ratio vs referent → over-reward / equity / under-reward.
- Locke goal-setting: specific + difficult + accepted + feedback. Basis of MBO and SMART goals.
- Porter-Lawler: effort → performance → reward → perceived equity → satisfaction (performance leads to satisfaction).
- Deci & Ryan SDT — autonomy, competence, relatedness.