flowchart LR
S[Stimulus<br/>person · object · event] --> SE[Selection<br/>attention]
SE --> O[Organisation<br/>grouping · figure-ground]
O --> I[Interpretation<br/>meaning]
I --> R[Response<br/>attitude · behaviour]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
19 Personality, Perception and Learning: Big Five and 16-PF, Type A/B, Locus of Control, Perceptual Process and Biases, and Classical-Operant-Social Learning
19.1 Three Building Blocks of Individual Behaviour
At the individual level, three closely linked processes shape behaviour at work. Personality is the relatively stable pattern of thoughts, feelings and actions a person carries from one situation to the next. Perception is how that person filters and interprets the world. Learning is how their behaviour changes durably through experience. A manager who understands the three has a far better chance of selecting, placing, motivating and developing people.
19.2 A · Personality
19.2.1 Concept and Definition
Gordon Allport (1937) offered the most-quoted definition: personality is “the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustments to his environment.”
Three threads run through every definition:
- Unique — no two people are identical.
- Consistent — patterns persist across time and situation.
- Adjustive — personality enables the person to deal with the environment.
19.2.2 Determinants of Personality
| Determinant | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Heredity | Genes, physical features, biological rhythms, intelligence |
| Environment | Family, society, culture, education, group membership |
| Situation | The specific context shapes which trait expresses itself |
19.2.3 Major Theories of Personality
| School | Lead figures | Core idea |
|---|---|---|
| Psychoanalytic | Sigmund Freud | Id–Ego–Superego; unconscious drives shape behaviour |
| Neo-Freudian | Jung, Adler, Horney | Social and cultural factors with Freud’s structure |
| Trait | Allport, Cattell, Eysenck | Personality = stable bundle of traits |
| Humanistic | Maslow, Rogers | Self-actualisation; congruence between real and ideal self |
| Social-cognitive | Bandura, Mischel | Behaviour shaped by reciprocal interaction of person, environment and behaviour |
19.2.4 Cattell’s 16-PF
Raymond Cattell used factor analysis to reduce a long list of trait words to sixteen primary factors — warmth, reasoning, emotional stability, dominance, liveliness, rule-consciousness, social boldness, sensitivity, vigilance, abstractedness, privateness, apprehension, openness to change, self-reliance, perfectionism and tension.
19.2.5 The Big Five (Five-Factor Model)
Modern consensus has converged on five broad factors — the OCEAN model.
| Factor | High score looks like |
|---|---|
| O — Openness to experience | Curious, imaginative, broad interests |
| C — Conscientiousness | Disciplined, organised, achievement-striving |
| E — Extraversion | Sociable, talkative, energetic |
| A — Agreeableness | Cooperative, trusting, warm |
| N — Neuroticism (vs Emotional stability) | Anxious, moody, easily upset |
Across most jobs, Conscientiousness is the Big Five factor most strongly correlated with job performance. NTA stems exploit this — not extraversion.
19.2.6 Type A and Type B Personalities
Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman (1959), two cardiologists, identified two behaviour patterns linked to heart disease.
| Dimension | Type A | Type B |
|---|---|---|
| Pace | Fast, urgent, time-pressured | Relaxed, easy-going |
| Competitiveness | High | Moderate |
| Hostility | Higher | Lower |
| Multitasking | Constant | Sequential |
| Coronary risk | Higher | Lower |
19.2.7 Locus of Control
Julian Rotter (1966) described the generalised expectancy of where the source of outcomes lies.
| Locus | Belief | Work implications |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | “My actions determine my outcomes” | Higher motivation, performance, job satisfaction; lower turnover |
| External | “Outcomes are due to luck, fate or powerful others” | Lower task-orientation; more compliant |
19.2.8 Other Important Personality Variables
| Variable | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Self-monitoring | Mark Snyder | Sensitivity to social cues; ability to adjust behaviour |
| Machiavellianism | Christie & Geis | Pragmatic, manipulative, emotional distance |
| Self-esteem | Coopersmith and others | Self-evaluation of worth |
| Risk-taking propensity | Various | Willingness to chance loss for gain |
| Authoritarian personality | Adorno | Rigid adherence to authority |
| Proactive personality | Bateman & Crant | Active shaping of environment |
| Core self-evaluation (CSE) | Judge et al. | Composite of self-esteem, self-efficacy, locus of control, low neuroticism |
19.3 B · Perception
19.3.1 What is Perception?
Perception is the process by which people select, organise and interpret sensory input to create meaning. The key insight: people do not respond to the world as it is, but to the world as they perceive it.
19.3.2 The Perceptual Process
19.3.3 Factors Influencing Perception
| Set | Examples |
|---|---|
| In the perceiver | Attitudes, motives, interests, experience, expectations |
| In the target | Novelty, motion, sound, size, background, proximity, similarity |
| In the situation | Time, work setting, social setting |
19.3.4 Gestalt Principles of Organisation
- Figure-ground — selecting one element to attend to against background.
- Similarity — grouping like with like.
- Proximity — grouping by closeness.
- Closure — filling in gaps to perceive a whole.
- Continuity — perceiving smooth, continuous lines.
19.3.5 Common Perceptual Errors
| Error | Description |
|---|---|
| Selective perception | Notice what matches existing interests; ignore the rest |
| Halo effect | One favourable trait colours all judgements (Thorndike, 1920) |
| Horn effect | One unfavourable trait colours all judgements |
| Stereotyping | Judging a person on the basis of their group |
| Projection | Attributing one’s own attitudes to others |
| First-impression error | Early information weighed too heavily (primacy) |
| Recency effect | Late information weighed too heavily |
| Contrast effect | Comparison with a recent prior person distorts |
| Self-serving bias | Credit success to self, blame failure on situation |
| Fundamental attribution error | Underweight situation, overweight disposition when explaining others |
19.3.6 Kelley’s Attribution Theory
Harold Kelley (1967) explained how people decide whether behaviour is caused by the person (internal) or by the situation (external) using three pieces of information:
| Criterion | Question |
|---|---|
| Consensus | Do other people behave the same way in this situation? |
| Distinctiveness | Does this person behave differently in other situations? |
| Consistency | Does this person always behave this way in this situation? |
Low consensus + low distinctiveness + high consistency → internal attribution. High consensus + high distinctiveness + high consistency → external attribution.
19.4 C · Learning
19.4.1 Definition
Learning is a relatively permanent change in behaviour or behavioural potential brought about by experience. Two requirements: change and endurance. Reflexes, illness-driven changes and natural development (e.g., puberty) are not learning.
19.4.2 Four Classical Theories of Learning
| Theory | Lead figure | Core mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| Classical conditioning | Ivan Pavlov | Pairing a neutral stimulus with one that triggers a response, until the neutral one alone triggers the response |
| Operant conditioning | B.F. Skinner | Behaviour is shaped by its consequences |
| Social (observational) learning | Albert Bandura | People learn by watching models |
| Cognitive learning | Edward Tolman | Latent learning of cognitive maps |
19.4.3 Operant Conditioning — Four Reinforcement Strategies
| Strategy | Action | Effect on behaviour |
|---|---|---|
| Positive reinforcement | Add a desired consequence | Increases the behaviour |
| Negative reinforcement | Remove an undesired condition | Increases the behaviour |
| Punishment | Add an undesired consequence | Decreases the behaviour |
| Extinction | Withhold reinforcement | Decreases the behaviour |
Negative reinforcement increases desired behaviour by removing something aversive. Punishment decreases behaviour by adding something aversive. NTA stems frequently swap the two.
19.4.4 Schedules of Reinforcement
| Schedule | Description | Behavioural pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed interval | Reinforce after a set time | Slow start, accelerates near deadline |
| Variable interval | Reinforce after variable time periods | Steady, moderate rate |
| Fixed ratio | Reinforce after a set number of responses | Steady, high rate; pause after reward |
| Variable ratio | Reinforce after a variable number of responses | Highest, steadiest rate; most resistant to extinction |
Variable-ratio reinforcement is the most powerful — the principle that makes slot machines and incentive bonuses work.
19.4.5 Shaping Behaviour
Shaping is the systematic reinforcement of each successive approximation toward a target behaviour. Used in training, behaviour modification (OB Mod) programmes and customer-service initiatives.
19.5 Practice Questions
In the Big Five model, the factor most strongly correlated with job performance across most jobs is:
View solution
The 16-PF personality inventory was developed by:
View solution
The locus-of-control concept was developed by:
View solution
The Type A and Type B personality classification was proposed by:
View solution
Removing an aversive condition to increase a desired behaviour is:
View solution
Which reinforcement schedule typically produces the highest and most extinction-resistant rate of response?
View solution
Social learning theory's four conditions for effective modelling — attention, retention, motor reproduction and motivation — are associated with:
View solution
The "halo effect" in perception was first identified by:
View solution
Kelley's attribution theory uses which three pieces of information?
View solution
Match the personality variable with the author:
| (i) | Self-monitoring | (a) | Christie & Geis |
| (ii) | Machiavellianism | (b) | Mark Snyder |
| (iii) | Locus of control | (c) | Adorno |
| (iv) | Authoritarian personality | (d) | Julian Rotter |
View solution
Classical conditioning is associated with:
View solution
The "fundamental attribution error" is the tendency to:
View solution
Core self-evaluation (CSE) is composed of:
View solution
Filling in gaps to perceive a complete pattern is the Gestalt principle of:
View solution
Reinforcing each successive approximation toward a target behaviour is:
View solution
"The dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustments to his environment" — this definition of personality is by:
View solution
An accountant interpreting an ambiguous business case mainly as a cost-control issue, while a marketer reads the same case as a brand issue, illustrates:
View solution
In the OCEAN model, the "A" stands for:
View solution
Which is not learning in the OB sense?
View solution
Internal locus of control is typically associated with:
View solution
19.6 Quick Recall
- Personality — Allport: “dynamic organisation” of psychophysical systems. Determinants: heredity, environment, situation.
- Trait schools: Allport, Cattell (16-PF), Eysenck (PEN). Modern consensus on Big Five (OCEAN): Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism. Conscientiousness predicts performance most strongly.
- Type A/B (Friedman & Rosenman, 1959) — Type A has higher coronary risk.
- Locus of control (Rotter, 1966) — internal vs external. Internals show higher motivation, performance, satisfaction.
- Other personality variables: self-monitoring (Snyder), Machiavellianism (Christie & Geis), risk-taking, authoritarian (Adorno), proactive (Bateman & Crant), CSE = self-esteem + self-efficacy + LoC + low neuroticism.
- Perceptual process: stimulus → selection → organisation → interpretation → response. Influenced by perceiver, target, situation.
- Perceptual errors: halo (Thorndike, 1920), horn, stereotype, projection, primacy/recency, contrast, self-serving bias, fundamental attribution error.
- Kelley’s attribution: consensus + distinctiveness + consistency.
- Learning = relatively permanent change through experience. Four theories: Classical (Pavlov), Operant (Skinner), Social (Bandura), Cognitive (Tolman).
- Skinner’s four strategies: positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment, extinction. Negative reinforcement ≠ punishment.
- Schedules: fixed interval, variable interval, fixed ratio, variable ratio (strongest).
- Bandura’s four conditions: attention, retention, motor reproduction, motivation.
- Shaping = reinforcing successive approximations.