flowchart LR
U[Unfreeze<br/>create awareness<br/>reduce defensiveness] --> C[Change<br/>introduce new<br/>behaviours]
C --> R[Refreeze<br/>stabilise<br/>reinforce]
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
24 Organisational Change and Development: Forces, Types and Levels of Change, Lewin’s Three-Step and Force-Field, Kotter’s Eight Steps, OD Interventions, Resistance and the Learning Organisation
24.1 Why Change at All?
No organisation operates in a vacuum. Technology, regulation, customer expectations, demographics and globalisation push every firm to change something — its strategy, its structure, its technology, its culture, its people. Organisational change is the process by which firms move from one state to another; organisational development (OD) is the planned, behavioural-science-grounded approach to managing that change. This chapter pulls together the forces driving change, the classical models (Lewin, Kotter), the main OD interventions, the patterns of resistance and the modern ideal of the learning organisation.
24.2 1 · Forces for Change
| External forces | Internal forces |
|---|---|
| Technology and digitisation | Strategy and leadership change |
| Customer needs and competition | New product launches |
| Workforce demographics and diversity | Performance gaps |
| Regulation and policy | Internal restructuring |
| Globalisation and trade flows | Mergers and acquisitions |
| Economic and political conditions | Cultural shifts |
| Social trends — wellness, sustainability | Workforce composition changes |
24.3 2 · Types and Levels of Change
24.3.1 Planned vs Reactive Change
- Planned change — proactive, designed in advance to achieve specific goals.
- Reactive change — response forced by a sudden event.
24.3.2 First-Order vs Second-Order Change
- First-order (incremental) — improving the present pattern; “more of the same, better”.
- Second-order (transformational) — fundamental shift in identity, strategy or structure.
24.3.3 Three Levels of Change
| Level | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Individual | Behaviour and skill of one person | Training, role change |
| Group | Team norms, processes, composition | Team-building, role re-design |
| Organisation | Structure, strategy, culture, technology | Re-org, digital transformation, M&A |
24.3.4 Four Targets of Change (Leavitt’s Diamond)
Harold Leavitt described four interacting targets — change in any one ripples through the others.
| Target | Examples |
|---|---|
| Structure | Hierarchy, span, centralisation |
| Technology | Tools, software, automation |
| Tasks | Job design, processes |
| People | Skills, attitudes, mindset |
24.4 3 · Lewin’s Three-Step Model (1947)
Kurt Lewin offered the most famous model of planned change.
| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| 1. Unfreeze | Loosen the existing equilibrium — create awareness of need; reduce defensiveness |
| 2. Change (move) | Introduce new behaviours, structures or processes |
| 3. Refreeze | Stabilise the new state through reinforcement, policy and reward |
Lewin = three steps (unfreeze-change-refreeze). Kotter = eight steps. NTA stems often swap the two.
24.5 4 · Lewin’s Force-Field Analysis
In any change situation, two opposing sets of forces act on the equilibrium.
| Force | Direction | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Driving forces | Push toward change | Strengthen — but with care |
| Restraining forces | Push against change | Reduce — usually more effective |
Reducing restraining forces is usually more effective than strengthening driving forces — the latter raises tension, the former dissolves resistance.
24.6 5 · Kotter’s Eight-Step Change Model (1996)
John Kotter generalised change leadership into an eight-step recipe.
| # | Step |
|---|---|
| 1 | Establish a sense of urgency |
| 2 | Form a powerful guiding coalition |
| 3 | Create a vision for change |
| 4 | Communicate the vision |
| 5 | Empower others to act on the vision |
| 6 | Plan for and create short-term wins |
| 7 | Consolidate improvements and produce more change |
| 8 | Institutionalise the new approaches in the culture |
The first four steps defrost the status quo; the next three introduce the change; the eighth refreezes it — Kotter’s grid maps onto Lewin’s three.
24.7 6 · Other Change Models Worth Knowing
| Model | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| ADKAR | Jeff Hiatt / Prosci | Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement — at the individual level |
| Bridges’ Transition | William Bridges | Ending → Neutral zone → New beginning |
| Beckhard’s Change Equation | Beckhard & Harris | C = D × V × F > R — change happens when Dissatisfaction × Vision × First steps exceed Resistance |
| McKinsey 7-S | Peters, Waterman, Pascale, Athos | Seven interdependent levers must align (already covered) |
| Appreciative Inquiry | Cooperrider | Build on strengths — Discover, Dream, Design, Destiny |
| Theory U | Otto Scharmer | Co-sensing, presencing, co-creating |
24.7.1 Beckhard’s Change Equation in Detail
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| C | Change |
| D | Dissatisfaction with the current state |
| V | Vision of the future |
| F | First concrete steps |
| R | Resistance |
The three drivers are multiplicative — if any one is zero, change does not happen.
24.8 7 · Organisation Development (OD) — Definition and Characteristics
24.8.1 Beckhard’s Definition (1969)
OD is a planned, organisation-wide, top-managed effort to increase organisation effectiveness and health through planned interventions in the organisation’s processes, using behavioural-science knowledge.
24.8.2 Six Defining Characteristics
- Planned and systematic.
- Long-term — not quick fixes.
- System-wide in scope, even if interventions are local.
- Top-managed.
- Grounded in behavioural science.
- Process-focused — concerned with how the organisation works, not only what it does.
24.9 8 · OD Process — Action Research
OD follows an action-research cycle in which diagnosis and action proceed in iterative loops.
flowchart LR
E[Entry &<br/>contracting] --> D[Diagnosis]
D --> F[Feedback]
F --> P[Planning]
P --> I[Intervention]
I --> EV[Evaluation]
EV -. cycle .-> D
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
24.10 9 · Classification of OD Interventions
French and Bell classified interventions by the target system.
| Target | Examples |
|---|---|
| Individual | Coaching, counselling, T-group, career planning |
| Dyad / triad | Process consultation, role-negotiation, third-party peacemaking |
| Team | Team-building, role analysis, responsibility charting |
| Inter-group | Inter-group conflict resolution, organisational mirroring |
| Total organisation | Survey feedback, confrontation meeting, Grid OD, large-group interventions (Future Search, Open Space, World Café) |
| Techno-structural | Job redesign, MBO, sociotechnical systems, TQM |
| Strategic | Strategy meetings, real-time strategic change |
| HRM | Performance appraisal, career planning, reward systems |
24.10.1 Five Frequently Tested Interventions
| Intervention | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (T-group) training | Kurt Lewin / NTL | Unstructured group; learn about self-in-group |
| Survey feedback | Floyd Mann | Survey results fed back to the team that generated them |
| Process consultation | Edgar Schein | Consultant helps group see its own processes |
| Confrontation meeting | Richard Beckhard (1967) | One-day meeting — sub-groups list issues, prioritise, plan action |
| Grid OD | Blake & Mouton | Six-phase programme to move toward 9,9 team style |
24.10.2 Modern Large-Group Interventions
| Intervention | Author | Idea |
|---|---|---|
| Future Search | Marvin Weisbord | 60+ stakeholders find common ground for the future |
| Open Space Technology | Harrison Owen | Self-organising agenda built by participants |
| World Café | Brown & Isaacs | Small-table conversations across rotating rounds |
| Appreciative Inquiry Summit | Cooperrider | Strengths-based group inquiry |
24.11 10 · Resistance to Change
24.11.1 Why People Resist
| Source | Description |
|---|---|
| Economic | Fear of job loss, pay cut, lost benefits |
| Psychological | Fear of the unknown, of incompetence, of loss of status |
| Social | Disruption of long-standing groups and friendships |
| Structural | Sunk investment in existing routines |
| Cultural | Threat to identity and meaning |
| Political | Loss of power, influence, resources |
24.11.2 Kotter and Schlesinger’s Six Strategies
| # | Strategy |
|---|---|
| 1 | Education and communication |
| 2 | Participation and involvement |
| 3 | Facilitation and support |
| 4 | Negotiation and agreement |
| 5 | Manipulation and co-option |
| 6 | Explicit and implicit coercion |
24.11.3 Functional Resistance
Not all resistance is harmful. Some resistance forces change agents to test their plans, surface flaws, and improve the design.
24.12 11 · Change Agents
A change agent is a person who initiates and manages change — internal (an HR or OD specialist, a leader) or external (a consultant). Effective change agents have:
- Diagnostic skill to read the system.
- Technical knowledge of the change content.
- Inter-personal skill to build trust and listen.
- Political skill to navigate the system.
- Personal credibility to be heard.
24.13 12 · The Learning Organisation
Peter Senge in The Fifth Discipline (1990) defined the learning organisation as one that continually expands its capacity to create its future, mastering five disciplines.
| # | Discipline |
|---|---|
| 1 | Personal mastery |
| 2 | Mental models |
| 3 | Shared vision |
| 4 | Team learning |
| 5 | Systems thinking (the integrating “fifth” discipline) |
24.13.1 Single-Loop vs Double-Loop Learning
Chris Argyris and Donald Schön distinguished:
| Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Single-loop | Fix the error while keeping the underlying mental model | Adjust the forecast formula because last quarter missed |
| Double-loop | Question and revise the underlying mental model itself | Re-examine the assumption that growth must come from the same channel |
| Triple-loop (later writers) | Reflect on how we learn to learn — meta-level | Rethink the firm’s theory of learning |
24.14 Practice Questions
Lewin's three-step model of planned change is:
View solution
In Lewin's force-field analysis, the generally more effective change strategy is to:
View solution
Kotter's eight-step change model begins with:
View solution
Beckhard and Harris's change equation says:
View solution
In the ADKAR model of individual change, the "D" stands for:
View solution
The classical "planned, organisation-wide, top-managed effort" definition of OD is by:
View solution
Leavitt's diamond identifies how many interacting targets of change?
View solution
The "confrontation meeting" OD intervention was developed by:
View solution
Grid OD is associated with:
View solution
Match the contribution with the author:
| (i) | Three-step change model | (a) | Kotter |
| (ii) | Eight-step change model | (b) | Senge |
| (iii) | Learning organisation | (c) | Argyris & Schön |
| (iv) | Single-/double-loop learning | (d) | Lewin |
View solution
Replacing one CRM tool with another, while keeping the same sales process and strategy, is best described as:
View solution
A team that, after a project failure, questions its underlying assumptions about how customers buy is engaging in:
View solution
Which is not a Kotter-Schlesinger strategy for overcoming resistance?
View solution
Process consultation, in which the consultant helps a group see its own processes, is associated with:
View solution
Senge's "fifth discipline" is:
View solution
Open Space Technology, a large-group OD intervention, was developed by:
View solution
Appreciative Inquiry is associated with:
View solution
Which is not a typical source of resistance to change?
View solution
William Bridges's transition model describes three phases:
View solution
The defining feature of action research in OD is:
View solution
24.15 Quick Recall
- Forces for change — external (technology, regulation, customer, demographics, globalisation) + internal (strategy, performance gaps, M&A).
- Types: planned vs reactive; first-order (incremental) vs second-order (transformational); individual / group / organisation.
- Leavitt’s diamond — four targets: structure, technology, tasks, people.
- Lewin’s three-step model: Unfreeze → Change → Refreeze.
- Lewin’s force-field — driving vs restraining forces; reduce restraining for durable change.
- Kotter’s eight steps: urgency, coalition, vision, communicate vision, empower, short-term wins, consolidate, institutionalise.
- Beckhard equation: C = D × V × F > R — multiplicative.
- ADKAR (Prosci) — individual-level change: Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement.
- Bridges’ transition — Ending → Neutral zone → New beginning.
- OD (Beckhard, 1969) — planned, system-wide, top-managed, behavioural-science based.
- Action-research cycle: entry → diagnosis → feedback → planning → intervention → evaluation → loop.
- Key interventions: T-group (Lewin), survey feedback (Mann), process consultation (Schein), confrontation meeting (Beckhard), Grid OD (Blake-Mouton).
- Large-group: Future Search (Weisbord), Open Space (Owen), World Café (Brown & Isaacs), Appreciative Inquiry (Cooperrider, 4-D).
- Sources of resistance: economic, psychological, social, structural, cultural, political.
- Kotter & Schlesinger — six strategies for overcoming resistance.
- Learning organisation (Senge, 1990) — five disciplines: personal mastery, mental models, shared vision, team learning, systems thinking (5th).
- Argyris & Schön — single-loop (fix within existing model), double-loop (revise the model), triple-loop (learn how we learn).