flowchart TB
I[Individual level<br/>personality · perception<br/>learning · attitudes<br/>motivation · stress]
G[Group level<br/>teams · communication<br/>leadership · power<br/>conflict]
O[Organisation level<br/>structure · culture<br/>change · OD]
I --> G --> O
classDef default fill:#003366,color:#ffffff,stroke:#ffcc00,stroke-width:3px,rx:10px,ry:10px;
18 Organisational Behaviour: Concept, Scope and Nature — Foundations, Three Levels of Analysis, Contributing Disciplines, OB Models and Hawthorne Roots
18.1 Why Study OB?
Organisational Behaviour (OB) is the systematic study of what people do in organisations and how their behaviour shapes — and is shaped by — the organisation’s performance. Where management studies what managers should do, OB studies what people in general actually do at work, drawing on psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology and political science. The field’s roots lie in the Hawthorne experiments (1924-32), which first revealed that productivity depends as much on the social structure of work as on its physical conditions.
18.2 1 · Definition and Concept
| Author | Definition |
|---|---|
| Stephen P. Robbins | “A field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups and structure have on behaviour within organisations, for the purpose of applying such knowledge towards improving an organisation’s effectiveness” |
| Fred Luthans | “The understanding, prediction and management of human behaviour in organisations” |
| Keith Davis | “The study and application of knowledge about how people act within organisations” |
Three elements run through every definition:
- Subject — behaviour of people at work.
- Method — systematic study, not casual common sense.
- Purpose — improve organisational effectiveness.
18.3 2 · Nature of OB — Seven Features
| Feature | Description |
|---|---|
| Behavioural science approach | Uses scientific method — observation, hypothesis, evidence |
| Multi-disciplinary | Draws on several behavioural sciences |
| Three levels of analysis | Individual, group, organisation |
| Goal-oriented | Aims at performance and well-being |
| Action-oriented | Knowledge meant to be applied |
| Humanistic | Treats people as ends, not only as means |
| Contingent | “It depends” — no one best way for every situation |
18.4 3 · Three Levels of Analysis
Most textbook treatments organise OB around three levels — each adding to the layer below.
| Level | What it studies | Typical topics |
|---|---|---|
| Individual | Behaviour of one person | Personality, perception, learning, attitudes, motivation, stress |
| Group | Behaviour in and of teams | Team formation, communication, leadership, power, conflict |
| Organisation | Whole-system behaviour | Structure, culture, change, OD, organisational effectiveness |
18.5 4 · Disciplines Contributing to OB
| Discipline | Level mainly served | Topics contributed |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | Individual | Personality, perception, learning, motivation, attitude, stress |
| Social psychology | Individual + group | Attitude change, group dynamics, communication, behaviour change |
| Sociology | Group + organisation | Group behaviour, organisational structure, formal organisation theory |
| Anthropology | Organisation | Organisational culture, cross-cultural differences |
| Political science | Organisation | Power, conflict, intra-organisational politics |
NTA stems frequently pair the discipline with its main contribution. Anthropology → organisational culture; Political science → power and politics; Psychology → individual behaviour; Sociology → group dynamics and structure.
18.6 5 · Scope of OB
The scope spans virtually every people-related topic in an organisation:
- Individual behaviour — personality, perception, learning, attitude, values, emotions, motivation, stress, decision-making.
- Inter-personal and group behaviour — communication, leadership, teamwork, conflict, power, politics.
- Organisational structure and design — span of control, departmentation, formalisation, centralisation, mechanistic vs organic.
- Organisational culture — values, norms, symbols, socialisation.
- Organisational change and development — planned change, OD interventions.
- Organisational effectiveness — measurement and improvement.
18.7 6 · The OB Models — Davis’s Four
Keith Davis offered the most widely cited classification of OB models, each defined by the implicit assumption a manager holds about people and work.
| Model | Basis | Managerial orientation | Employee orientation | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autocratic | Power | Authority | Obedience | Subsistence |
| Custodial | Economic resources | Money | Security and benefits | Passive cooperation |
| Supportive | Leadership | Support | Job performance | Awakened drives |
| Collegial | Partnership | Teamwork | Responsible behaviour | Moderate enthusiasm |
Davis later added a fifth — System model — based on trust, community and meaning, with the employee oriented to psychological ownership.
Autocratic → Custodial → Supportive → Collegial → System. The shift across the sequence is from control to commitment.
18.8 7 · The Hawthorne Studies — Birth of OB
Conducted at Western Electric’s Hawthorne Works (Cicero, Illinois) between 1924 and 1932, the studies were led by Elton Mayo, F.J. Roethlisberger and William Dickson.
| Phase | Study | Year | Finding |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illumination experiments | 1924-27 | Output rose with lighting changes — but also when lighting was reduced, suggesting non-physical factors mattered |
| 2 | Relay Assembly Test Room | 1927-32 | Output went up regardless of working conditions — attention itself improved performance (“Hawthorne effect”) |
| 3 | Mass Interview Programme | 1928-30 | Workers had unexpressed grievances and informal opinions of supervision; structured listening mattered |
| 4 | Bank Wiring Observation Room | 1931-32 | An informal group restricted output to a self-defined norm — informal organisation can defeat formal incentives |
18.8.1 Key Hawthorne Conclusions
- Workers are social beings — not merely economic.
- Informal groups form around work and powerfully shape behaviour.
- Supervision style and attention can lift output more than physical conditions.
- Communication and grievance airing matter.
- The factory is a social system, not merely a productive arrangement.
The Hawthorne effect = the tendency of subjects to alter behaviour because they are being observed, not because of the intervention itself. Originated in the Relay Assembly Test Room phase.
18.9 8 · Human Relations vs OB
| Dimension | Human Relations (1930s-50s) | OB (1960s onward) |
|---|---|---|
| Roots | Hawthorne studies | Behavioural sciences broadly |
| Emphasis | Happy worker = productive worker | Behaviour is more complex than that |
| Methods | Mainly qualitative, case-based | Rigorous empirical research |
| Scope | Individual + small-group focus | Individual, group, organisation |
| View of conflict | Conflict is dysfunctional | Conflict can be functional |
| Driver | Mayo, Roethlisberger | Maslow, McGregor, Herzberg, Likert, then modern OB scholars |
18.10 9 · OB as a Science and as an Art
OB is a science in its method — systematic observation, hypothesis testing, empirical evidence. It is an art in application — judgement, context, the manager’s sense for the situation. Both are required: theory without practice is empty; practice without theory is blind.
18.11 10 · Limitations of OB
- Behavioural bias — over-emphasising people may neglect technology and economics.
- Diminishing returns — at some level of investment, additional behavioural intervention adds little.
- Manipulation risk — the same knowledge can be used to nudge people for their own good or against their interest.
- Cultural relativity — much OB knowledge is Western in origin and must be re-tested elsewhere.
- “It depends” can become an evasion — contingency thinking must still lead to a decision.
18.12 Practice Questions
Organisational Behaviour is best described as:
View solution
The three classical levels of OB analysis are:
View solution
Anthropology's primary contribution to OB is:
View solution
Power, conflict and intra-organisational politics are primarily contributed to OB by:
View solution
The Hawthorne studies were led primarily by:
View solution
The "Hawthorne effect" refers to:
View solution
The Bank Wiring Observation Room phase of the Hawthorne studies primarily showed that:
View solution
Which is not one of Keith Davis's OB models?
View solution
Arrange Davis's OB models in the order of their historical evolution:
(i) Supportive
(ii) Autocratic
(iii) Collegial
(iv) Custodial
View solution
Match the discipline with its primary OB contribution:
| (i) | Psychology | (a) | Power and politics |
| (ii) | Sociology | (b) | Personality and motivation |
| (iii) | Anthropology | (c) | Group behaviour and structure |
| (iv) | Political science | (d) | Organisational culture |
View solution
The textbook definition of OB foregrounding "individuals, groups and structure" is associated with:
View solution
A firm that emphasises pension, medical, housing and other security-oriented benefits is operating closest to which Davis model?
View solution
Fred Luthans defines OB as the "understanding, prediction and management" of behaviour. Which is not implied?
View solution
The Illumination experiments of the Hawthorne studies surprised researchers because:
View solution
Which is not a feature of OB as a field?
View solution
Davis later added a fifth OB model rooted in trust, community and meaning. It is called the:
View solution
A major difference between the Human Relations movement and modern OB is that OB:
View solution
Which topic is most clearly studied at the group level of OB?
View solution
The Mass Interview Programme phase of the Hawthorne studies revealed that:
View solution
A common criticism of OB is "behavioural bias", meaning:
View solution
18.13 Quick Recall
- OB = systematic study of behaviour in organisations. Robbins: individuals × groups × structure → organisational effectiveness.
- Three levels: Individual (personality, perception, motivation), Group (teams, leadership, communication, power), Organisation (structure, culture, change).
- Contributing disciplines: Psychology (individual), Sociology (group + structure), Social psychology (attitudes, change), Anthropology (culture), Political science (power, politics).
- Davis’s four OB models: Autocratic → Custodial → Supportive → Collegial (later +System). Mnemonic: A-C-S-C-S. Shift = control → commitment.
- Hawthorne studies (1924-32) at Western Electric, led by Mayo, Roethlisberger, Dickson. Four phases: Illumination, Relay Assembly, Mass Interview, Bank Wiring.
- Hawthorne effect = subject behaviour changes because of being observed.
- Bank Wiring: informal groups can restrict output to a self-defined norm.
- Human Relations vs OB: HR sees conflict as dysfunctional; OB recognises functional conflict.
- OB limitations: behavioural bias, diminishing returns, manipulation risk, cultural relativity.